The School of Education collects and analyzes data, on an on-going basis, relative to candidate performance and unit operations related to content and pedagogical knowledge (professional and State standards), content and pedagogical performance (clinical practice), instructional planning, candidate impact on student learning, and dispositions (professional, State, and institutional). The purpose of this data collection and analysis is to evaluate the progress of candidates and to improve programs.
There are five phases of the SOE Assessment System. In phase one, the Assessment Coordinator collects, analyzes, and summarizes the assessment data at the admission, retention, and program exit checkpoints. In the second phase, summarized data from candidate assessments, including data from the six required key assessments, and unit operations are disseminated for review and discussion to: SOE faculty and staff, SOE Curriculum Committee, College of Education and Health Services, and the Teacher Education Advisory Committee, which includes school partners.
During phase three, the SOE Curriculum Committee (SOE program faculty, Chair and Assistant Chair of SOE, and the Assessment Coordinator) has the primary responsibility to analyze the assessment data related to content and pedagogical knowledge (state standards), content and pedagogical performance (clinical practice), instructional planning, candidate impact on student learning, and dispositions (professional, state, and institutional) and develop the Assessment Reports. These reports represent how these data are used to improve both candidate performance and program quality. The Assessment Reports, while based on individual assessments, are a summary of findings, faculty’s interpretations, and changes to be made at the program and unit levels.
In phase four, the SOE Curriculum Committee discusses the Assessment Reports with the SOE Department at regularly scheduled meetings throughout the academic year, and makes recommendations for ongoing program and unit improvement. During the fifth phase, these recommendations are implemented according to a specified timeline. The recommendations then become part of the Assessment System elements during the next assessment review cycle.
Dr. Mary Jeffery, Ed.D.
Dr. Mary Jeffery, Assessment Coordinator and Assistant Licensure Officer
Send Dr. Jeffery an Email
Dr. Mary Jeffery is an assistant professor with the School of Education and is the Assistant Licensure Office and Assessment Coordinator. She came to Benedictine University as an adjunct instructor and student teaching supervisor in January 2011 after teaching and administrating in secondary public schools for over 15 years. After receiving her bachelor’s degree at Illinois Wesleyan University, Dr. Jeffery followed her love of adventure and moved to Arizona where she worked to develop alternative education programs for high school students. She moved from Arizona to Michigan and completed her Masters of Arts in Teaching K-12 Reading at Saginaw Valley State University. Dr. Jeffery recently completed her Doctorate in Education with a concentration in Leadership in Curriculum and Instruction at Aurora University. Her current position marries her varied background and interests; her administrative experience guides her interest in assessment and her teaching experience guides her interest in working with preclinical candidates, advising, and teaching licensure.