|
|
|
 |
|
Center for
Teaching and Learning Excellence
Academic Assessment
Pursuant to the mission
statement and guided by the vision statement, Benedictine University
creates a community of scholars who are committed to Learning,
Scholarship, Service and Diversity.
In her book Assessment Clear and Simple, Barbara E.
Walvoord defines assessment of student learning as "the systematic
collection of information about student learning, using the
time, knowledge, expertise and resources available, in order
to inform decisions about how to improve learning." The academic
assessment process at Benedictine University is consistent with
this and founded on nine principles
of good practice in order to foster and improve student
learning. As part of the practice of effective teaching, all
faculty have the responsibility for assessing their own courses.
Numerous measures are employed to assist in this process, producing
direct and indirect "evidence"
of learning. For example, the IDEA
Form provides useful indirect feedback from students
about teaching effectiveness, progress on course learning objectives,
and a norm-referenced framework for comparisons.
- Click on the "Assessment Methods"
link (left) to learn more about surveys, tests, and rubrics
for course and program level assessment.
The program learning objectives are aligned with the University
common learning objectives;
each academic program demonstrates alignment using a Program
Assessment Matrix tool. As part of the Matrix, each program
identifies the key program direct and indirect outcomes, or what
the students should be able to represent, demonstrate or produce
as a result of their learning in the program/department.
Based on program specific priorities, generally two to four
KEY assessment approaches/tools that mark the achievement
of the student learning outcomes/objectives are targeted annually
by the department for potential improvements. At the end of
the term, participating faculty members (i.e., those that teach
the courses where those identified assessment approaches/tools
are employed) provide Department Chairs/Program Directors supporting
narratives and data (with analysis) of how their own course
specific pedagogy changes/improvements impacted the intended
learner objectives/outcomes, and next steps for improvement.
Department chairs/Program Directors evaluate these results against
program established benchmarks/goals and submit an Annual Program
Assessment Reports, which includes a plan of priorities for
implementation for the following year (guidelines posted on
the S drive). Collectively, department members should ensure
that all program objectives/outcomes are examined at least once
over the program review period (e.g., five years).

In addition to the substantial efforts made by departments/programs,
as part of university planning, we have the following student
surveys and tests scheduled for administration on the following
cycles:
- Career Development Survey to alumni - annual
- National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) - every three
years
- Mission Perception Survey - every three years
- Collegiate Learning Assessment (CLA) - every three years
- Writing Exams (internal) - annually
- Operations/service satisfaction surveys (service queried
may vary) - at least once annually
- Cooperative Institutional Research Program (CIRP) Freshmen
Survey - every three years
|